Little are being said
about the Fitch Ratings which recorded a negative outlook for Malaysia in its
latest report. It is important to note that the ratings have a great impact on
the perception of foreign investors whereby keeping a good rating is important
in order to sustain the country’s competitiveness.
The negative report
on Malaysia is technically a ‘side-effect’
from the global market trend which is greatly affected by the uncertainties and
instability in the oil-producing countries.
Apart from that,
Fitch stated that Malaysia’s ‘lack of
reform’ to tackle rising debt is stated as one of the factors that caused a
negative outlook on the country’s sovereign credit rating. The country’s
widening fiscal deficit of RM14.9 billion plus high government debt of 53
percent of gross domestic product have also contributed to the fall in the
ratings.
Fitch believes that
Malaysia would hardly achieve its interim three per cent deficit target for
2015 without consolidation measures. The public finances have also worsened
since the government’s weak showing in the May 2013 general elections.
Fitch has long
emphasised two key budgetary vulnerabilities: reliance on petroleum-derived
revenues and the high and rising weight of subsidies in expenditure. It is
estimated that petroleum-derived revenues contributed 33.7 per cent of federal
revenues in 2012. Should the government not take any drastic measure to tackle
the effect, it may lead to outflow of foreign capital and result in higher
borrowing costs for the country.
Since the government
has the responsibility to ensure the well-being of Malaysians in all walks of
life, an unpopular decision to rationalize subsidies on fuel prices was
announced earlier this evening. The announcement was received with an immediate
outcry - as expected.
But Malaysians must
understand that the rationalization of fuel subsidies would help push a
positive outlook on Malaysia, thus encourage foreign investment into the
country. A good outlook is vital at a time when the world is seeing nothing but
the fall of Islamic countries – one after another.
The allocation meant
for subsidies could then be used for projects with long term benefits,
particularly development, emphasising on rural areas including Sabah and
Sarawak.
This would help boost
Malaysia’s economy, as well as improving the quality of lives of the rural
communities. Apart from that, the government has also projected a higher BR1M
amount for the low-incomes, to help them cope with the rising cost of living.
With that, the people
would not be greatly affected while Malaysia picks-up speed in its quest to
become a high-income nation very soon.
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan